Conclusiones CM publice disputandae

prefatioannot

secundum doctrinam latinorumannot

arrow

1. Alberti Magniannot

arrow

2. Thomae Aquinatisannot

arrow

3. Francisci de Maironisannot

arrow

4. Iohannis Scotiannot

arrow

5. Henrici Gandavensisannot

arrow

6. Egidii Romaniannot

secundum doctrinam Arabumannot

arrow

7. Avenroisannot

arrow

8. Avicennaeannot

arrow

9. Alpharabiiannot

arrow

10. Isaac Narbonensisannot

arrow

11. Abumaronis Babyloniiannot

arrow

12. Moysis Aegyptiiannot

arrow

13. Maumethis Tolletiniannot

arrow

14. Avempacis Arabisannot

secundum Graecosannot

arrow

15. Theophrastiannot

arrow

16. Ammoniiannot

arrow

17. Simpliciiannot

arrow

18. Alexandri Aphrodiseiannot

arrow

19. Themistiiannot

secundum doctrinam Platonicorumannot

arrow

20. Plotini Aegyptiiannot

arrow

21. Adelandi Arabisannot

arrow

22. Porphyrii Tyriiannot

arrow

23. Iamblici Chalcideiannot

arrow

24. Procli Lyciiannot

[ ]

arrow

25. Pythagoraeannot

arrow

26. Chaldeorum theologorumannot

arrow

27. Mercurii Trismegisti Aegyptiiannot

arrow

28. Cabalistarumannot

secundum opinionem propriam

arrow

1. paradoxe numero xvii

arrow

2. philosophice numero lxxxannot

arrow

3. paradoxe numero lxxiannot

    1. Sicut esseannot

    2. Non possumusannot

    3. Qui attingitannot

    4. Solus illeannot

    5. Quanto unusquisqueannot

    6. Sicut cognitioannot

    7. Sicut deusannot

    8. Si Theologiaannot

    9. Vera methaphysicaannot

    10. Sicut inannot

    11. Eadem resannot

    12. Sicut angelusannot

    13. Contradictoria inannot

    14. Licet sitannot

    15. Contradictoria coinciduntannot

    16. Rationabiliter posuitannot

    17. In intellectuannot

    18. Ideo inannot

    19. Unumquodque inannot

    20. Ipseitas uniuscuiusqueannot

    21. Per praedictasannot

    22. Nemo mireturannot

    23. Sicut formaeannot

    24. Non potestannot

    25. Nisi destruamusannot

    26. Ex praecedentibusannot

    27. Quinque ponendaannot

    28. Rectius adannot

    29. Ratio predicamentiannot

    30. Ratio praedicamentiannot

    31. Ratio praedicamentiannot

    32. Ratio praedicamentiannot

    33. Ratio praedicamentiannot

    34. Nullum estannot

    35. Sicut deannot

    36. Sicut intellectusannot

    37. Primum intelligibileannot

    38. In animisannot

    39. Dictum illudannot

    40. Posse animamannot

    41. Sicut seannot

    42. Infinitas deiannot

    43. Actus quoannot

    44. Aristoteles libroannot

    45. Ordo librorumannot

    46. Dato quocunqueannot

    47. Melius potestannot

    48. Praeter triaannot

    49. Magis improprieannot

    50. Sola materiaannot

    51. Tria suntannot

    52. Eadem estannot

    53. Qui primamannot

    54. Ad probandumannot

    55. Qui ordinemannot

    56. Preter distinctionemannot

    57. Species inimicitiaeannot

    58. Formalitas estannot

    59. Ubicunque daturannot

    60. Nihil intelligitannot

    61. Tota substantiaannot

    62. Anima seipsamannot

    63. Quamvis inannot

    64. Intellectualis naturaannot

    65. Quia intellectusannot

    66. Potest animaannot

    67. Cuilibet serieiannot

    68. Omnes animaeannot

    69. Rationabile estannot

    70. Cum tresannot

    71. Empedocles perannot

arrow

4. in theologia numero xxxiannot

arrow

5. lxii in doctrina platonisannot

arrow

6. in doctrina abucaten avenanannot

arrow

7. de mathematicis numero lxxxvannot

arrow

7a. questionesannot

arrow

8. xv de intelligentia ...annot

arrow

9. magicae numero xxviannot

arrow

10. xxxi intelligendi hymnos orpheiannot

arrow

11. cabalisticae numero lxxiannot

colophon

announcement

registrumannot

trailer

corrigenda

secundum opinionem propriam arrow 3. paradoxe numero lxxi

previous next

Prev

Next

II.3.62. Anima seipsam semper intelligit: et se intelligendo quodammo|do omnia entia intelligit.

Annotations

Sort by:

 

All: The belief in the soul’s ability to acquire knowledge of the creation and the Divine by the means of self-concentration was responsible for these controversial theses, which became the key propositions in Pico\'s theory of knowledge. As a consequence of man’s fall, Pico believed, the soul has forgotten that true knowledge is to be acquired through self-reflection and eventually transferred its attention into the material manifestations of the world, which are only the shadow (or, in Gnostic terms, mirror reflection) of the divine. Once its memory is restored, the soul enters a series of successively higher and nobler modes of contemplation, until finally, through the faculty of cognition, “through images that were co-created with it in its origin, which while in the body it either never or rarely uses” (Thesis 6, in Farmer, p. 215), it apprehends itself as part of the essence from which all things have materialized. In this state the soul is finally able to regain its former intellectual greatness, as all “separated and divine things” become “totally known” to us, because “the self identity of each and every thing is then most itself when in itself all things exist in such a way that in itself all things are itself”. (Theses 219 and 519) As we can see, the faculty of Intellect is very closely associated here with the spiritual faculty as both become equally indispensable in attaining the desired union with the godhead. Note also that Pico’s idea of the highest mode of understanding pertains to his interpretation of the philosophical concept of formal knowledge attainable by an act “equivalent not to an intellectual act but to the object itself” – thesis 581 in Farmer
 

 


 

 

All: El alma siempre se intelige a sí misma e inteligiéndose en cierto modo intelige todos los entes.