Conclusiones CM publice disputandae

prefatioannot

secundum doctrinam latinorumannot

arrow

1. Alberti Magniannot

arrow

2. Thomae Aquinatisannot

arrow

3. Francisci de Maironisannot

arrow

4. Iohannis Scotiannot

arrow

5. Henrici Gandavensisannot

arrow

6. Egidii Romaniannot

secundum doctrinam Arabumannot

arrow

7. Avenroisannot

arrow

8. Avicennaeannot

arrow

9. Alpharabiiannot

arrow

10. Isaac Narbonensisannot

arrow

11. Abumaronis Babyloniiannot

arrow

12. Moysis Aegyptiiannot

arrow

13. Maumethis Tolletiniannot

arrow

14. Avempacis Arabisannot

secundum Graecosannot

arrow

15. Theophrastiannot

arrow

16. Ammoniiannot

arrow

17. Simpliciiannot

arrow

18. Alexandri Aphrodiseiannot

arrow

19. Themistiiannot

secundum doctrinam Platonicorumannot

arrow

20. Plotini Aegyptiiannot

arrow

21. Adelandi Arabisannot

arrow

22. Porphyrii Tyriiannot

arrow

23. Iamblici Chalcideiannot

arrow

24. Procli Lyciiannot

[ ]

arrow

25. Pythagoraeannot

arrow

26. Chaldeorum theologorumannot

arrow

27. Mercurii Trismegisti Aegyptiiannot

arrow

28. Cabalistarumannot

secundum opinionem propriam

arrow

1. paradoxe numero xvii

arrow

2. philosophice numero lxxxannot

arrow

3. paradoxe numero lxxiannot

    1. Sicut esseannot

    2. Non possumusannot

    3. Qui attingitannot

    4. Solus illeannot

    5. Quanto unusquisqueannot

    6. Sicut cognitioannot

    7. Sicut deusannot

    8. Si Theologiaannot

    9. Vera methaphysicaannot

    10. Sicut inannot

    11. Eadem resannot

    12. Sicut angelusannot

    13. Contradictoria inannot

    14. Licet sitannot

    15. Contradictoria coinciduntannot

    16. Rationabiliter posuitannot

    17. In intellectuannot

    18. Ideo inannot

    19. Unumquodque inannot

    20. Ipseitas uniuscuiusqueannot

    21. Per praedictasannot

    22. Nemo mireturannot

    23. Sicut formaeannot

    24. Non potestannot

    25. Nisi destruamusannot

    26. Ex praecedentibusannot

    27. Quinque ponendaannot

    28. Rectius adannot

    29. Ratio predicamentiannot

    30. Ratio praedicamentiannot

    31. Ratio praedicamentiannot

    32. Ratio praedicamentiannot

    33. Ratio praedicamentiannot

    34. Nullum estannot

    35. Sicut deannot

    36. Sicut intellectusannot

    37. Primum intelligibileannot

    38. In animisannot

    39. Dictum illudannot

    40. Posse animamannot

    41. Sicut seannot

    42. Infinitas deiannot

    43. Actus quoannot

    44. Aristoteles libroannot

    45. Ordo librorumannot

    46. Dato quocunqueannot

    47. Melius potestannot

    48. Praeter triaannot

    49. Magis improprieannot

    50. Sola materiaannot

    51. Tria suntannot

    52. Eadem estannot

    53. Qui primamannot

    54. Ad probandumannot

    55. Qui ordinemannot

    56. Preter distinctionemannot

    57. Species inimicitiaeannot

    58. Formalitas estannot

    59. Ubicunque daturannot

    60. Nihil intelligitannot

    61. Tota substantiaannot

    62. Anima seipsamannot

    63. Quamvis inannot

    64. Intellectualis naturaannot

    65. Quia intellectusannot

    66. Potest animaannot

    67. Cuilibet serieiannot

    68. Omnes animaeannot

    69. Rationabile estannot

    70. Cum tresannot

    71. Empedocles perannot

arrow

4. in theologia numero xxxiannot

arrow

5. lxii in doctrina platonisannot

arrow

6. in doctrina abucaten avenanannot

arrow

7. de mathematicis numero lxxxvannot

arrow

7a. questionesannot

arrow

8. xv de intelligentia ...annot

arrow

9. magicae numero xxviannot

arrow

10. xxxi intelligendi hymnos orpheiannot

arrow

11. cabalisticae numero lxxiannot

colophon

announcement

registrumannot

trailer

corrigenda

secundum opinionem propriam arrow 3. paradoxe numero lxxi

previous next

Prev

Next

II.3.21. Per praedictas conclusiones intelligi potest quae sit omiomeria |Anaxagorae: quam opifex intellectus distinguit.

Annotations

Sort by:

 

per satyram omnia simul mixta: The last portion of Pico’s preface – omnia simul mixta – translated by Farmer as “everything mixed together,” may be an allusion to the often-cited fragment of Anaxagoras that states “all things were together (panta chrêmata ên homou).” Ambrosius Traversarius rendered this text of Anaxagoras as omnia simul erant in his early 15th-century translation of Diogenes Laertius’s influential De vita et moribus philosophorum, while various texts from the medieval Aristoteles Latinus tradition rendered Anaxagoras’s text as omnia mixta or simul omnia.

As a literary allusion to Anaxagoras, the text omnia simul mixta may indicate how Pico viewed the planned disputation of his wide-ranging theses. According to Diogenes Laertius, Anaxagoras began his treatise with the words “All things were together; then Mind arrived and arranged them in order” (De vita, II.3). Diogenes then recounts that Anaxagoras himself acquired the nickname of Mind, since his was the mind that ordered what had previously been a mixture. Thus, in this preface to the Conclusiones, Pico may be presenting himself as the new “Mind,” who in the course of the disputation will give order to the “mixture” of views contained in his theses taken from various traditions. That Pico is familiar with Anaxagoras’s account of the ordering function of Mind is shown in thesis II.3.21.

This possible literary allusion to Anaxagoras in Pico’s preface is obscured with Biondi’s Italian rendering of omnia as an adverb and taking satyra in the sense of satire. See Conclusiones nongentae: Le novecento tesi dell'anno 1486, a cura di Albano Biondi (Firenze: Leo S. Olschki Editore, 1995). Farmer argues, contra Biondi, that satyra should be taken in the sense of “mixture or medley.” See S. A. Farmer, Syncretism in the West: Pico’s 900 Theses (1486): The Evolution of Traditional Religious and Philosophical Systems (Tempe, AZ: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1998), 188, 210.
 

 


 

 

All: Por las conclusiones precedentes se puede entender qué sea la homeomería de Anaxágoras, a la que distingue el Artífice del intelecto.